International arbitration News, analytics and practice

8Oct/160

2016 ICSID Annual Report

ICSID 2016 ICSID Annual ReportThe Annual Report provides an overview of the activities during the past ICSID fiscal year, including information on developments in the ICSID membership and caseload, designations to the Panels of Arbitrators and of Conciliators, resolutions adopted by the Council, publications, and financial statements on the income and expenditures of the Centre.

Filed under: Surveys Continue reading
20Oct/151

Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards – study on public policy (2015)

The Subcommittee on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards conducted over 2014/2015 a comparative study on 'public policy' as a defence to the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards under the New York Convention. For such purpose, the Subcommittee has solicited and received reports from Arbitration Committee members reporting jurisdiction by jurisdiction on the treatment of public policy by the domestic courts in the context of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

13Oct/150

2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration

The 2015 International Arbitration Survey (download) conducted  by Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) is the third survey carried out in partnership with White & Case. The theme of this year's survey is improvements and innovations in international arbitration. The survey examined the effectiveness of past innovations and what could be improved in the future.

White and Case arbitration survey 2015 Queen Mary University1 2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration

Findings include:

  • 90% of respondents surveyed prefer international arbitration to resolve cross border commercial disputes.
  • London and Paris are the most preferred venues for international arbitration. Hong Kong and Singapore are gaining momentum and are now ranked third and fourth.
  • Initiatives to further improve the efficiency of the arbitral process are welcomed. Arbitrators and arbitration counsel need to be more proactive in promoting efficiency, not just arbitral institutions.
  • 70% of respondents think there is an adequate amount of regulation although specific areas require further 'micro-regulation'.

Download White & Case infographic summary:

arbitration infographics 2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration

Retrieved from White & Case