As we were informed by the founder of judge.me online arbitration platform this initiative would provide ODR services to world at large. Individuals and companies may resolve their disputes through this platform by using its legal dispute resolution services.
Microsoft, the United States-based multinational computer technology corporation has recently won a domain name case against TN Chen. The company submitted a complaint to the National Arbitration Forum, requesting the disputed domain names bing-wallpaper.com and bingimg.com to be transferred from the respondent to the complainant.
Recently the arbitration court at the public association “Ukrainian arbitration union” (Odessa) issued an award. That award was adopted after the hearings which were held by means of telecommunication. The participants presented their position to the arbitration court in video conference. The award was announced to the parties through a web-cam as well. Later on the award was signed as a written document and forwarded to the parties. This event became a ground for discussion in Ukrainian specialized mass media. Some of my colleagues treated that event as a step to implementation and propagation of the Internet-arbitration concept. Though I welcome that progressive practice I am far from believing that e-arbitration is limited to or its main feature consists of the possibility of web-hearings. Electronic form arbitration clause (agreement), e-claim, admissibility of electronic evidences, turnover of electronic documents during the process and enforceability of an electronic award, - that is an inexhaustive list of main issues related to the e-arbitration concept. If the reader is interested in that matter I would recommend to familiarize with the document “International commercial arbitration. 5.9. Electronic arbitration” prepared under the auspices of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).